6 min read
If someone in your house uses ChatGPT, a new lawsuit in Texas could eventually shape how that app works, at least for people in that state. On Friday, Oct 23, 2026, the office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued OpenAI, the company that makes ChatGPT, along with its chief executive, Sam Altman.
The state is asking a judge to keep minors off ChatGPT and to require an outside evaluator, picked by the court, to sign off on new OpenAI models before they are released in Texas. Everything in the complaint is an allegation. No court has ruled on any of it, and OpenAI says it has worked with experts to add safeguards.
What happened
The case was filed in a state district court in Collin County, Texas, according to the Texas Tribune and Courthouse News Service. Courthouse News reported that the complaint runs 67 pages.
Courthouse News reported that the suit is built mainly on the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a consumer protection law aimed at misleading business practices, and also invokes the SCOPE Act (short for Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment). According to the Texas attorney general's office, the SCOPE Act took effect on Sept 1, 2024, and requires many online services to record each user's age, limit how they handle the data of users under 18, and give verified parents tools to manage a minor's settings.
According to Courthouse News, the state claims that OpenAI misled Texans about how safe and dependable ChatGPT is, especially for teenagers, and that the company put the product out before it had adequate safety testing, age checks or tools for parents. The same report said that the complaint points to at least eight cases in which people committed violent acts after consulting ChatGPT. The Texas Tribune reported that the attorney general's office also claims minors are becoming hooked on the chatbot while it collects their data without a parent's knowledge.
The state is asking for a broad court order, called an injunction, that would block minors from using ChatGPT and require approval from the court-appointed evaluator before new models go out in Texas, according to the Texas Tribune and Courthouse News. Altman is named as a defendant alongside the company.
OpenAI's answer, given to the Texas Tribune by a spokesperson, was that the company has worked with experts to reduce risks and add safeguards. The spokesperson said governments have an important part to play in setting AI safety standards, and that OpenAI wants to work with Texas and other states on rules covering the whole AI industry rather than a single company. Courthouse News said that, at the time it published, neither OpenAI nor the attorney general's office had answered its request for comment.
Texas is not alone. On Wednesday, Oct 14, eight other states (Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska and West Virginia) said they had sued OpenAI, each filing separately in its own state courts, according to Reuters; the Associated Press reported on the same suits. Reuters reported that those states want changes to how ChatGPT works, civil penalties and damages, along with a ban on developing self-improving AI models unless OpenAI can show they are aligned with human values. Florida filed the first state lawsuit of this kind in June, according to Reuters and CNN.
In response to the eight-state suits, OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told the AP the company favors "pragmatic AI policies that apply to the entire AI industry." The company also told the AP that ChatGPT is meant for users 13 and older, that anyone under 18 needs a parent's permission, and that a separate teen version has extra protections around self-harm, violence, eating disorders and explicit content.

KRUDO's Fine Print
Nothing changes today. A lawsuit is a request. Filing it does not by itself change ChatGPT; limits would come only if a judge orders them or the two sides agree to them.
These are claims, not findings. The cases of violence, the addiction claims and the safety allegations are the state's version of events. None of the reports said a court has tested them yet.
No dollar figure in the main reports. The Texas Tribune and Courthouse News reports did not say how much money, if any, the state is asking for.
The evaluator idea has few details so far. The reports describe the request for a court-appointed reviewer to approve new models in Texas, but none explained how that reviewer would be chosen, what tests would be used or how long approval would take.
Nine states, nine separate cases. The Texas suit and the eight from Oct 14 are not one combined case. Each runs under its own state's laws and in its own court, so they can move at different speeds and end differently.
Parental controls already exist, with limits. OpenAI's help pages say parents who link accounts can change settings, but they cannot read their teen's conversations, and safety alerts are not real-time monitoring.
How this kind of thing happens
State attorneys general can sue companies under consumer protection laws when they believe a product was sold in a misleading or harmful way. The state files a complaint, the company responds, and both sides exchange evidence. Along the way, the state can ask a judge for an early, temporary order, and the company can ask the judge to throw out some or all of the claims. Cases like this can take months or years, and some end in a settlement before any final ruling; the Texas Tribune noted that Paxton's office has sued or settled with other tech companies under the state's consumer protection laws.
Age checks are at the center of this fight. Many apps simply ask users to type in a birth date, which is easy to fake. Stricter checks can mean estimating age from how an account is used or asking for proof, which raises its own privacy questions.
What it means for you
If you live in Texas or one of the other states that sued, the outcome could affect what your children are allowed to do on ChatGPT, and possibly how quickly new versions reach you. If you live elsewhere, these cases are still worth watching, because a court order or settlement in one state could lead a company to change its product more widely.
For now, the practical situation for families is unchanged. The tools and limits that exist today are the ones you have to work with, and they depend on parents setting them up.
What you can do
- Check the age rules. OpenAI says ChatGPT is for ages 13 and up, and users under 18 need a parent's permission.
- Link your teen's account. OpenAI's help center says a parent can go to Settings, then Parental controls, then Add family member, and send an invitation that the teen accepts. A teen can also invite a parent from the same menu.
- Adjust the settings. Once linked, OpenAI says parents can set quiet hours, turn off voice mode and image generation, and stop ChatGPT from referring to saved memories.
- Know what you will not see. OpenAI says parental controls do not let parents read or monitor a teen's conversations, so a regular, calm conversation with your teen about how they use it still matters.
- Double-check health and legal answers. Treat a chatbot's medical or legal advice as a starting point and confirm it with a qualified professional.
- In an emergency, call for help. OpenAI says its safety alerts do not replace professional care or emergency services, and that anyone in immediate danger should contact local emergency services.
From the publisher · KRUDO Designs
This part is about our own product.
HOLLIS H-Ai from KRUDO Designs is built and now in testing before launch. It isn't built to answer everything; it's built for your household's daily tasks: reminders, calendar, shopping list, pantry, expenses, food and macro targets. It runs on your own computer, and your information stays in your household.
Sources
- Texas Tribune, Oct 23, 2026
- Courthouse News Service, Oct 23, 2026
- Associated Press (via Spectrum News), Oct 15, 2026
- Reuters (via Business Insurance), Oct 15, 2026
- CNN (via KTVZ), Jun 1, 2026
- OpenAI Help Center: ChatGPT for teens, accessed Oct 25, 2026
- Texas Attorney General: SCOPE Act page, accessed Oct 25, 2026
This article is based on the published reports listed above, written in our own words. Details are as reported on the dates shown. Spotted an error? Email support@krudodesigns.net and we will correct it.



